The problem with communication here is that I can see at least two reasonable definitions of “luck.”
One is that luck is some supernatural force that either “smiles” on us, or leaves us cold, as the song goes, “…if it weren’t for bad luck, I’d have no luck at all… born under a bad sign…”
This is the definition of luck that I don’t subscribe to. I know that many do, but I believe that karma (balance), destiny (our best potentials), and fate (the result , on the other side of the = sign, of our life's equation) direct our lives (that is to say, we direct our own lives), rather than the above view of “luck.” I know that many think fate and karma are the same, because they both have to do with our choices. While they are closely related, fate deals with the results of directions we’ve chosen, talents we’ve chosen to develop, and ideas and ideals we’ve chosen to nurture. Karma keeps the whole of our life (or lives, depending on your beliefs) in balance, an equilibrium.
Now, the “luck” that I was referring to: even with the above understanding of destiny, fate, and karma, many things happen that we don’t understand the cause (or mechanics) of. A lack in the depth of my understand doesn’t necessarily signal “supernatural fortune or forces (Lady Luck) at work”… So, to verbalize my lack of understanding about what caused certain things to happen (the mechanics of it), I refer to that lack of understanding as “luck,” “good luck” if the event was fortuitous and “bad luck” if the event worked against my interests (but nothing supernatural, just something for which we have not yet penetrated the mechanics).
So, any time I mention "luck," it just means, "I don't know why..."...;-)
Art is the proper task of life.
--Friedrich Nietzsche

